#DOMINOS WEBSITE MOVIE#
Title III prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the activities of places of public accommodations (businesses that are generally open to the public and that fall into one of 12 categories listed in the ADA, such as restaurants, movie theaters, schools, day care facilities, recreation facilities, and doctors' offices) and requires newly constructed or altered places of public accommodation-as well as commercial facilities (privately owned, nonresidential facilities such as factories, warehouses, or office buildings)-to comply with the ADA Standards. His attorneys argued in light of the ADA civil rights law, particularly Title III, labeled Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities: Robles also tried the Domino's app with his iPhone's built-in VoiceOver screen-reading feature but his lawsuit says that the unlabeled buttons found in the app made it nonconforming to Apple's iOS accessibility guidelines. However, Robles' attorneys pointed out that Domino's website did not have this accessibility feature at the time he tried to use it.
#DOMINOS WEBSITE WINDOWS#
Robles used the "Job Access With Speech" or JAWS, a screen-reading program available on Windows that processes graphics or embedded links on websites with alternative text (alt text). The case was started by a blind man named Guillermo Robles, who sued Domino's after being unable to order pizzas from the company's website and mobile app despite using screen-reading software. The company in this case was Domino's Pizza, whose appeal against the ruling was later rejected by the Supreme Court, allowing visually impaired Guillermo Robles to sue the pizza chain for its obstructive website and app, which prevented him from ordering food.Īlthough Domino's likes to embrace technology for better customer experiences, the pizza chain's website recently became the subject of a lawsuit when it was found to be inaccessible for the disabled. Why it matters: A ruling given by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals marks the first time that the Title III of the ADA civil rights law was applied to a business' website or mobile apps.
0 kommentar(er)
